Mobile Processor Ranking List 2025: Understanding Benchmarks, Performance, and Key Factors
Qualcomm, MediaTek, and Apple consistently release upgraded mobile processors annually, driving competition in smartphone performance. This article compares their latest System-on-Chip (SoC) offerings using benchmark scores from AnTuTu and Geekbench, which evaluate overall capabilities and single/multi-core efficiency. These metrics provide insight into how each chip handles everyday tasks—like app navigation and multitasking—as well as demanding workloads, including graphics-intensive gaming, 4K video editing, and AI-powered photo enhancements. By analyzing these scores, users can gauge real-world performance differences between flagship processors. Below, we present the 2025 ranking of top mobile SoCs, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses to help consumers and tech enthusiasts make informed decisions when choosing devices for power, efficiency, or balanced usage.
Smartphone Processors Ranking List in 2025
| RANKING | PROCESSOR NAME | ANTUTU BENCHMARK SCORE | GEEKBENCH SCORE | |
| SINGLE-CORE | MULTI-CORE | |||
| 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | 28,05,924 | 3,093 | 9,854 |
| 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | 25,37,181 | 2,683 | 7,767 |
| 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 21,86,467 | 2,303 | 7,376 |
| 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus* | 2094061 | 2,302 | 7,547 |
| 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | 20,38,916 | 2,203 | 7,295 |
| 6 | Apple A18 Pro | 17,74,620 | 3,285 | 8,021 |
| 7 | Apple A18 | 17,64,170 | 3,278 | 7,995 |
| 8 | Samsung Exynos 2400 | 17,27,225 | 2,130 | 6,557 |
| 9 | Samsung Exynos 2400e | 16,25,873 | 2,074 | 6,407 |
| 10 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 15,09,605 | 1,930 | 5,017 |
| 11 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | 14,50,949 | 1,826 | 4,544 |
| 12 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus | 14,45,926 | 1,854 | 5,066 |
| 13 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra | 12,99,678 | 1,239 | 4,189 |
| 14 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | 9,36,985 | 1,020 | 3,384 |
| 15 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | 8,19,347 | 1,138 | 2,950 |
* – Indicates the scores have been taken from third-party sources
Top 10 Android Mobile Processors Ranking List
| RANKING | PROCESSOR NAME | ANTUTU BENCHMARK SCORE | GEEKBENCH SCORE | |
| SINGLE-CORE | MULTI-CORE | |||
| 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | 28,05,924 | 3,093 | 9,854 |
| 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | 25,37,181 | 2,683 | 7,767 |
| 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 21,86,467 | 2,303 | 7,376 |
| 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus* | 2094061 | 2,302 | 7,547 |
| 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | 20,38,916 | 2,203 | 7,295 |
| 6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 | 17,27,225 | 2,130 | 6,557 |
| 7 | Samsung Exynos 2400e | 16,25,873 | 2,074 | 6,407 |
| 8 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 15,09,605 | 1,930 | 5,017 |
| 9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | 14,50,949 | 1,826 | 4,544 |
| 10 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus | 14,45,926 | 1,854 | 5,066 |
* – Indicates the scores have been taken from third-party sources
Top 10 MediaTek Processors Ranking List
| RANKING | PROCESSOR NAME | ANTUTU BENCHMARK SCORE | GEEKBENCH SCORE | |
| SINGLE-CORE | MULTI-CORE | |||
| 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | 25,37,181 | 2,683 | 7,767 |
| 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus* | 2094061 | 2,302 | 7,547 |
| 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | 20,38,916 | 2,203 | 7,295 |
| 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus | 14,45,926 | 1,854 | 5,066 |
| 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra | 12,99,678 | 1,239 | 4,189 |
| 6 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | 9,36,985 | 1,020 | 3,384 |
| 7 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | 7,39,074 | 1,050 | 2,957 |
| 8 | MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro | 7,72,758 | 1,121 | 2,203 |
| 9 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | 7,28,534 | 1,190 | 2,681 |
| 10 | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 6,01,441 | 903 | 2,325 |
Top 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon Processors Ranking List
| RANKING | PROCESSOR NAME | ANTUTU BENCHMARK SCORE | GEEKBENCH SCORE | |
| SINGLE-CORE | MULTI-CORE | |||
| 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | 28,05,924 | 3,093 | 9,854 |
| 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 21,86,467 | 2,303 | 7,376 |
| 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | 16,11,015 | 2,023 | 5,564 |
| 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | 15,09,605 | 1,930 | 5,017 |
| 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | 14,50,949 | 1,826 | 4,544 |
| 6 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | 8,19,347 | 1,138 | 2,950 |
| 7 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | 7,96,785 | 1,198 | 3,232 |
| 8 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition | 7,14,295 | 1,117 | 3,048 |
| 9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | 6,64,130 | 872 | 2,826 |
| 10 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 | 4,71,687 | 926 | 2,145 |
Top 10 Samsung Exynos Processors Ranking List
The following rankings are based on scores from Nanoreview.
| RANKING | PROCESSOR NAME | ANTUTU BENCHMARK SCORE | GEEKBENCH SCORE | |
| SINGLE-CORE | MULTI-CORE | |||
| 1 | Exynos 2400 | 17,44,941 | 2,196 | 6,964 |
| 2 | Exynos 2200 | 11,16,347 | 1,582 | 3,669 |
| 3 | Exynos 2100 | 8,70,181 | 1,356 | 3,348 |
| 4 | Exynos 1480 | 7,34,625 | 1,168 | 3,503 |
| 5 | Exynos 990 | 7,27,249 | 840 | 2,670 |
| 6 | Exynos 1380 | 5,95,359 | 999 | 2,758 |
| 7 | Exynos 9825 | 6,45,378 | 669 | 2,354 |
| 8 | Exynos 9820 | 6,09,223 | 741 | 2,317 |
| 9 | Exynos 1330 | 4,29,652 | 929 | 2,128 |
| 10 | Exynos 1280 | 4,68,341 | 851 | 1913 |
Top 10 Google Tensor Processors Ranking List
| RANKING | PROCESSOR NAME | ANTUTU BENCHMARK SCORE | GEEKBENCH SCORE | |
| SINGLE-CORE | MULTI-CORE | |||
| 1 | Google Tensor G4 | 13,23,184 | 1,903 | 4,419 |
| 2 | Google Tensor G3 | 8,44,840 | 1,727 | 3,433 |
| 3 | Google Tensor G2 | 7,12,747 | 1,029 | 2,942 |
| 4 | Google Tensor | 6,75,033 | 1,039 | 2,817 |
Top 10 Apple Processors Ranking List
The following rankings are based on scores from Nanoreview.
| RANKING | PROCESSOR NAME | ANTUTU BENCHMARK SCORE | GEEKBENCH SCORE | |
| SINGLE-CORE | MULTI-CORE | |||
| 1 | Apple A18 Pro | 17,13,073 | 3,337 | 8,218 |
| 2 | Apple A18 | 15,39,646 | 3,336 | 7,988 |
| 3 | Apple A17 Pro | 15,28,179 | 2,953 | 7,441 |
| 4 | Apple A16 Bionic | 14,46,983 | 2,627 | 6,838 |
| 5 | Apple A15 Bionic | 12,88,091 | 2,332 | 5,736 |
| 6 | Apple A14 Bionic | 10,91,814 | 2,079 | 4,779 |
| 7 | Apple A13 Bionic | 8,89,260 | 1,748 | 4,161 |
| 8 | Apple A12 Bionic | 6,48,637 | 1,292 | 2,837 |
| 9 | Apple A11 Bionic | 4,79,366 | 1,087 | 2,346 |
| 10 | Apple A10 Fusion | 4,21,512 | 878 | 1,319 |
Mobile Processor Ranking List 2025: Understanding Benchmarks, Performance, and Key Factors
Qualcomm, MediaTek, and Apple dominate the annual race to launch cutting-edge mobile processors, making the mobile processor ranking list a critical reference for tech enthusiasts. This article delves into how AnTuTu and Geekbench scores shape these rankings, explores the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s benchmark performance, and highlights factors to consider when selecting a smartphone. By analyzing these elements, we aim to simplify how the mobile processor ranking list reflects real-world usability for tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking.
What Are AnTuTu and Geekbench, and How Do They Work?
AnTuTu Benchmark
AnTuTu is a comprehensive benchmarking tool that evaluates a smartphone’s hardware by simulating intensive tasks. It tests the GPU’s 3D rendering capabilities, CPU efficiency, memory speed, and storage performance to generate an overall score. Devices with higher AnTuTu scores typically excel in graphics-heavy apps, multitasking, and sustained performance. For instance, the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s AnTuTu v9 score from 91mobiles’ review reflects its ability to handle demanding games and apps smoothly. These scores are pivotal in shaping the annual mobile processor ranking list, as they quantify raw power across diverse scenarios.
Geekbench
Geekbench focuses on CPU performance by running single-core and multi-core tests. Single-core scores gauge responsiveness for everyday tasks like app launches, while multi-core scores measure efficiency in parallel workloads, such as video rendering or AI computations. The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s Geekbench results highlight its processor’s ability to balance speed and efficiency. Like AnTuTu, Geekbench scores are integral to the mobile processor ranking list, offering insights into how chipsets handle both routine and intensive operations.
Galaxy S23 Ultra’s AnTuTu and Geekbench Scores
According to 91mobiles’ review, the Galaxy S23 Ultra delivers stellar AnTuTu v9 and Geekbench scores, cementing its position in the 2025 mobile processor ranking list. Its high AnTuTu score underscores superior GPU and memory management, ideal for gaming and multitasking. Meanwhile, its Geekbench multi-core performance shines in productivity tasks, proving why flagship processors like Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Apple A17 Bionic dominate these rankings.
Factors Influencing the Mobile Processor Ranking List
- Thermal Management
A processor’s ranking hinges on its ability to manage heat. Efficient cooling systems prevent throttling during prolonged gaming or 4K video recording. Brands like ASUS and Xiaomi integrate vapor chambers or graphite layers to dissipate heat, ensuring sustained performance. Always verify thermal specs on the manufacturer’s website before relying on the mobile processor ranking list. - Real-World Performance
While benchmark scores dominate the mobile processor ranking list, real-world usage can differ. For example, a chip with a high AnTuTu score may stutter if software optimization is poor. Cross-reference benchmarks with hands-on YouTube reviews to gauge actual smoothness, app load times, and gaming stability. - Video Recording Capabilities
Budget and midrange phones often cap video resolution at 1080p due to processor limitations. Flagship chips like Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 or Dimensity 9300 enable 8K recording, making them staples in the mobile processor ranking list for content creators.
FAQs: Decoding the Mobile Processor Ranking List
Q: Which processor tops the mobile processor ranking list for gaming?
A: Flagship chips like Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Apple A17 Bionic, and Dimensity 9300 lead the mobile processor ranking list for gaming. Mid-premium options like Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 and Dimensity 9200+ also deliver smooth gameplay, provided the phone has robust cooling and optimized software.
Q: What’s the best midrange phone for gaming?
A: The POCO X6 Pro (Dimensity 8300 Ultra), POCO F6, and Realme GT 6T rank highly in the mobile processor ranking list for budget gaming. They balance performance with thermal efficiency, avoiding overheating during extended sessions.
Q: Should you always choose the top-ranked processor?
A: The mobile processor ranking list prioritizes raw power, but your needs matter. High-end chips excel in gaming and editing, but midrange processors like Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 suffice for social media and streaming.
Conclusion
The mobile processor ranking list serves as a roadmap to identify chips that align with your needs—be it gaming, content creation, or daily use. By combining AnTuTu and Geekbench scores with real-world testing, brands like Qualcomm, MediaTek, and Apple continue to redefine smartphone performance. Whether you’re a casual user or a power user, understanding this list ensures you invest in a device that balances power, efficiency, and value.
Also Read Below Article :
Exynos 1380 vs Snapdragon 778G 5G: A Comprehensive Comparison of Mid-Range Mobile Chipsets
MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra vs. Snapdragon 8s Gen 3: A Comprehensive Performance Analysis